Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Smile, Chicago! You're on EveryScape!

Have you heard of EveryScape ?  Neither had we until we saw one of the company's camera cars cruising up Printer's Row.


It's one of a number of companies trying to out-Google Google's Street Views service.  Usually these other companies offer fewer cities (EveryScape currently offers 21 cities), but with much higher resolution photos, or other features to make them competitive with Big G.

How do they do that, while Google has to blur its photos?  Well, the fact is that Google only blurs its photos for its own convenience.  I hate to break this to anyone with an exaggerated sense of self-worth, but if you're on a public street, anyone can take your picture at any time and use it for whatever purpose they want.  This has been tried over and over for a hundred years and courts in the United States have continually ruled that you have no right to privacy if you're on a public street.  Yes, that even applies to minors and other children.  I've been through a dozen sessions with media lawyers on this very topic.

It's the reason that TV and newspaper photography crews are able to do their jobs.  Ditto with insurance companies, and the local tax assessor.  There are dozens and dozens of companies that have databases of photos of your home, your yard, your car, and maybe even you if you've ever stood on a sidewalk or walked down a street.

So, why does Google blur faces and license plate numbers?  Legally, it doesn't have to.  The only reason it does (in the United States) is because of the hassle of fielding thousands of complaints from thousands of people who believe they have been wronged in the eyes of the law, when they really haven't and don't know what the law actually is.

Google could spend $20 million a year doing the right thing and defending its photographs in court, or it could spend $1 million a year on technology to blur out people's faces.  It's entirely a money game.  It's not the right thing to do, but Google has to please its shareholders.

How do the other services get away with using higher-resolution photos?  Because they're smaller companies, they can fly under the radar for now.  When they get bigger -- who knows?  Until then, keep an eye out for your home soon on EveryScape.

3 comments:

  1. Hi there,

    Glad to see that you've spotted us out on the streets. I'm EveryScape's director of marketing and I'm always interested to hear what people think about our technology and content. The first phase of Chicago content (primarily the downtown and major streets) should be live this summer and I'd love to hear your thoughts when it goes live. Email me at rebecca(at)everyscape(dot)com to tell me what you think.

    --Rebecca MacQuarrie

    ReplyDelete
  2. No problem, Rebecca. Looking forward to seeing your product. Be sure to drop us a line at editor@chicagoarchitecture.info to let us know when it's live.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can't wait to see everyscape's Chicago imagery. It baffles me how Chicago has been neglected considering that everyscape has captured over 35 locations to date. There's even 11 cities in Colorado. Colorado? It appears that everyscape is headquartered in Massachusetts. I thought maybe they were in Colorado. Perhaps the execs just love visiting Colorado. Well, it's to know that Chicago will soon be joining this growing list of cities.

    ReplyDelete

You can write a comment about this article below, but that's kind of just a one-way street. For full whiz-bang interactivity, click here to comment on this article at the Chicago Architecture Info Forum.